When last we left our story, I was at a panel discussion with Dan Didio and some DC artists and writers and he was asking questions of the audience and panelists. One of them was a very interesting question to which I had what I thought was a brilliant, insightful answer, and even had relevance to the ostensible reason for me being there:
“Who was the first artist you started following and did you
start following comics for the character or the artist?”
Funny thing about that…
Of course, growing up, I saw Archie and Casper the Friendly
Ghost comics and superhero comics, and I was aware that the art was different
for Archie and Casper than it was for Batman. However, the first time I
actually noticed a specific artist’s art as being distinctive of of other
artists was when I saw the original Captain Marvel.
Though I was not yet sophisticated enough to tell the
difference between C.C. Beck and Kurt Schaffenberger, I did realize that the
Big Red Cheese, in both reprints of old stories from Fawcett Publications and
the contemporary stuff from DC, was not like what I saw in Batman, Superman,
Spider-Man, and other superhero comics (which was what most of my other comics
were). It was simpler, clearer. One
might say it was more “cartoony,” but the simplicity disguised the mastery of
the medium that Beck and Schaffenberger had. The storytelling was always clean
and concise. The anatomy was proportionate and believable.
However, in 1981, DC decided to give Captain Marvel a
makeover. Out went that simple style of Kurt Schaffenberger (who was drawing
the hero at the time) and in came the slightly warped but realistically
detailed work of Don Newton. I actually avoided reading those stories in Action
Comics because I did not like seeing that art for Captain Marvel. I spent hours
trying to think of which artists would be able to draw the World’s Mightiest
Mortal in the appropriate style, and did not understand that calling for such a
change back was a lost cause. DC wanted to update the look, and there it was.
Now, of course, I recognize the quality and skill of
Newton’s art. I also see how he was able to realistically distort faces and
features for comedic effect. Captain Marvel always was a quasi-comedic
character, and one of the challenges faced by DC when they revived him was how
to keep the lightness and whimsy in the character while making him relevant and
appealing to the modern world. It was a shame I did not read too many of those stories,
either, because some of them were quite good, and some of them actually went
into the hero’s past and explained aspects of his origin, powers, and backstory
that had not been explored before.
So that would have been an interesting thing to share with
Dan Didio and the lineup of artists, writers, and editors on stage. It would
have also been interesting to see his reactions and hear his thoughts,
considering what DC has done with the character and the concept under his watch
at DC.
3 comments:
Small correction: Don Newton's Shazam ran from the last issue of Shazam (35) to World's Finest Dollar Comic (253-282), finally finishing in 2 issues of Adventure Comics digest (491 and 492). They were all written by the great E. Nelson Bridwell and I hope they get reprinted one day as they truly deserve it.
Finally, I really love your blog and videos! Thanks for the work you do. I've been a big fan of Cap since 1975 and live in Toronto, where the Shazam movie begins filming next February.
Thanks for the specificity. I left it vague beyond the year because I didn't have my books with me when I wrote the post. I hope those stories get reprinted someday, also. Many of them were much better than a lot of what had gone before in DC's "Shazam!" series.
I am so pleased to hear you are enjoying Captain Marvel Culture! Yes, I am trying to clear up a lot of the confusion about the character. Are you going to try to get some background work in the movie?
Post a Comment